In this second part in my “Home Rule for the West” series I argue that there are three main despotisms which through their influence have replaced our democracy with elite dictatorship.
All three are death cults. One is in government, the other two are not.
I will also argue how the policy of “regime change” is a strategy to create a permanent emergency in your homeland through the mass immigration of the victims of foreign wars.
This post is part-paywalled by way of thanks to my supporters. If you have no money and would like to read my work send me an email and I will send you a free link. 10% off now.
Contents
Despotism as Democracy - The Three Cults of Death
What is Despotism? - A definition by Isaiah Berlin
Permanent War Faction (“The Liberal Interventionists”) - Death by Democracy
Techno-Futurists (WEF etc) - Making Machines of Men
Rights-Based Grievance (Soros, etc) - How to Dissolve Society
DESPOTISM AS DEMOCRACY
There are three forms of despotism which make our democracy inferior to dominion status.
They are despotic because they are directed by self-appointed elites whose opinion of themselves gives them the right to shape your life. They see themselves as “philosopher kings” whose expertise and superior wisdom qualifies them to shape your present, your future, and your idea of yourself and everything else.
They are the architects of a reality for which no one voted, and which we are compelled without consent to inhabit.
Each of these despotisms claims they speak for democracy and for a better world. Each is utopian, inspired by a fantasy. All three are promising and delivering a nightmare reality to replace the natural order.
The three forms of despotism are arranged in the following cults:
Permanent War - the “neocons”, “liberal interventionists”. Creed: Shock Doctrine
Techno-Futurists - WEF, Transgender cult etc. Creed: Techno-Futurism
Rights Based Grievance - Soros, NGOs. Creed: Atomisation
All three cults are anti-life, anti-God and undemocratic. They are managed by self-appointed elites and billionaire leaders who consider themselves justified to rule through their superior expertise and wisdom.
What is “despotism”?
The greatest champion of Liberalism in the 20th Century was Sir Isaiah Berlin. A Russo-English Jew, he knew a thing or two about tolerance, democracy, and the pluralism of values which he said defined the liberal state.
Our nations don’t tolerate value pluralism. They are intolerant of anything except what they call “Our values”. These values are basically:
War, rainbow flags, “gender” , mass immigration, debt, abortion and Net Zero.
These are not “our” values but the values of an elite who think they are better than all of us, and therefore entitled to tell us all what to do, for our own good, whether we like it or not. “You will own nothing and be happy”.
In his essay on “My Intellectual Path”, Isaiah Berlin said
“There have always been thinkers who hold that if only scientists, or scientifically trained persons, could be put in charge of things, the world would be vastly improved.
To this I have to say that no better excuse, or even reason, has ever been propounded for unlimited despotism on the part of an elite which robs the majority of its essential liberties.”
Berlin’s description of an elite dictatorship fits our system perfectly.
If he were alive today, I am certain he would agree that our system is neither liberal nor democratic. It is a monster which has killed both liberty and democracy, and goes about wearing the face of its victims like a mask.
Permanent War Faction
These people believe loosely in the idea that history has declared “liberal democracy” the winner. This means elections plus consumerism. They believe they have a moral authority and moral duty to spread this system everywhere by force.
I explained “the neocons” here:
In practice, their policies place all nations including their own in a permanent state of emergency through war and the mass migration and terrorism which it creates.
The Permanent War Faction are in an undeclared war with you. They control the foreign policy of the US Empire.
The policies of Permanent War have destroyed the economy of the West through vast expense and sabotage. They have resulted in the mass migration of millions of people into the Western homelands.
The techniques refined to cause “regime change” are now used at home, and combined with the vast amounts of money involved have resulted in a war industry which has corrupted our politics absolutely.
I have posted a long thread on twitter/X about regime change here.
The use of the democratic argument for war results in the following formula for permanent war in your homeland:
The Empire declares war on an undemocratic nation
It attacks that nation directly or through proxies
It tells that nation it is being attacked because it is not a democracy
It tells the world that our nations are superior because democratic
This means we choose the government
This means we commanded the wars
This means we are being blamed by our own governments for the wars
Our governments then allow millions of these people, whose nations we bombed, to come to our homelands
If the democratic argument is sound, we are personally responsible for killing these people’s friends families and destroying their nations
How would you feel?
Our government’s argument means terrorists have a legitimate reason to kill you in your own homeland
Our governments know this
Our governments bring them here
When terror attacks happen, our governments instruct us to light candles and not look back in anger.
This last response is a coordinated media template designed by the deep state to contain public sentiment in the event of terror attacks. It is one example of the “narrative networks” developed and described by DARPA (the Pentagon’s Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency).
I wrote about them in this piece on the Posthuman Future:
These officially crafted alibis for reality are deliberately broadcasted in a coordinated manner to manipulate your feelings in a way which makes you more manageable by the management. This should be obvious following Operation Pandemic.
The international response to the migrant crisis created by permanent war is another example of narrative manufacture. Is there any evidence of this manufacture? Yes.
Here below is an interesting article on the propaganda strategy allegedly used in Britain to shape public opinion in the wake of terror attacks. Called “controlled spontaneity”, it is a UK government-coordinated template combining public relations, social media hashtags and staged events to control the public response to the terrorism which naturally results from state policy.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Frank Wright to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.