Lev Bronshtein, or “Leon Trotsky”, was the name of the Bolshevik who led the insurrection in 1917 that would secure the October Revolution.
Yet his influence far extends beyond his leadership of the Red Army, and his subsequent assassination in Mexico on the orders of the Georgian Josef Dzhugashvili - Stalin.
His influence shaped the radicalism of Tony Blair and the regime change of the neocons1. It also reveals how we came to be ruled by the Bolshevik Voodoo of “racism”.
Yesterday, a UK court upheld a libel case against British gadfly Laurence Fox - for calling a pair of homosexual perverts “paedophiles”.
This was in exchange to their calling him a “racist”.
Fox claimed he lost because the judge “could not define what a racist was”.
For the benefit of Mr Fox, and anyone esle likely to be baited by two queers into losing two million quid, “racist” is a voodoo curse to silence the noticing of reality.
Liberalism now shares the ossification and the absurdity which bedevilled its competitor religion of mankind, Communism.
We inhabit a state of unreality, or “hypernormalisation”, which describes the unease of being right when the government is wrong about everything.
The reason why the government is wrong has a lot to with the fact its ideas have reached their limit. These ideas of Bolshevik and Liberal utopias have always described a world that does not and will never exist.
To this very day our lives are shaped by concepts invented by fanatical utopianists, whose imposition is necessary to make their mad fantasises make sense. One of these fanatics was Leon Trotsky.
THE ROOTS OF RACISM
Trotsky was a bit of a racist himself, as it goes, describing Stalin as a Mongol.
“Trotsky’s mammoth biography Stalin (1940) not only belittles Stalin’s revolutionary activities but actually sees his life and ‘moral stature’ predetermined by his racially defined genetic composition; after discussing whether or not Stalin had ‘an admixture of Mongolian blood,’
Trotsky decides that in any case he was one perfect type of the national character of southern countries such as Georgia, where, ‘in addition to the so-called Southern type, which is characterized by a combination of lazy shiftlessness and explosive irascibility, one meets cold natures, in whom phlegm is combined with stubbornness and slyness.’”
Contemporary Ukrainian nationalists say the same about Putin, who was portrayed as Genghis Khan in a piece by the Wall Street Journal’s Ukrainian Foreign Affairs specialist Yaroslav Trofimov.
Trotsky did not like “Slavophiles” - a group of traditionalist Slavs who valued greatly their native culture and way of life, and wanted to protect it.
If you love your people, your religion, traditions and your nation, then Trotsky would not like you either.
He was a champion of nonsense , and hated normal people and their norms.
Trotsky saw them - and others like them - as an impediment to internationalist communism.
So how did Trotsky hope to unite the disparate peoples of the former Russian empire?
BOLSHEVIK VOODOO
In 1930 Trotsky popularised the term “racism”. Though the word is said to have first appeared in a speech in 1902, it was only after Trotsky’s use of the term in his 1930 history of the Russian Revolution that it began to take off.
What did he say about racism?
"Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great.
Marx remarked upon this theme: "In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them."
This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ’racists.’"
Whilst Trotsky did not “invent” the term, he was the first to see its power in organising a political mythos to dominate the “backward slaves” and their traditional, Christian culture.
His motives in doing so are more nuanced than simply replacing kinship with worker’s solidarity.
Trotsky’s own remarks betray his own chauvinism. It is the belief that he is better, and the traditionalists “backward”.
It is this inspiration of a self appointed elite to lead a permanent revolution which we find in the discovery of the weapon of “racism”.
This chauvinistic fervour now marks out the true believing Liberal from we deplorables.
What racism is, to those inspired by Trotsky, is a meme designed to destroy. It is thrown at noticers of basic facts, to label and ruin them for the display of their love of their heritage.
It is a slur on those who remark on the conspiracy of national suicide which is offered to them as progress by their politicians.
Racism is promoted aggressively to dissolve traditional cultures, homelands - yours - to be replaced by the utopian schemes of your betters.
People like Trotsky. The princes of nonsense.
Later, I will go on about this. I have made the sort of discovery that bookworms of a certain persuasion find unusually delightful. It might get me GULAG’d, but at this point it is surely a matter of time. Soon. Coming soon. Or going. Lole.
Say what you will about Stalin, but at least he made sure Trotsky died open minded.
I've spent too many of my years working inside of both gigantor banks and law firms. One thing I noticed back in the 90s is that the corporation is the perfect totalitarian communist structure. It has a pure and inviolable hierarchy of authority, it dispenses edicts with alacrity and often perfect illogic, and to some extent provides a kind of sustenance to the majority who work there, until it decides not to but without ennobling or enriching the soul in any way. Quite the contrary.
Racism as an accusation, an insult, a term of shunning, is extremely useful in pursuit of complete totalitarian control under the oligarchic corporate structure. We can understand the full court press of woke/trans/climate change/covid ideology as it has been deployed by government (as a weapon of the corporation) and the corporation itself, in this light. Any idea that contravenes this totalitarian mission is "racist" or "homophobic". It is color revolution cultural transmogrification in its purest form: the wedge issue of the west designed to finally and completely subvert and overthrow our entire traditional and spiritual edifice.