BETRAYED BY RIGHTS
BETRAYED BY RIGHTS
The Untold Story of the Trans Widows
Today I bring you a post in two parts.
Part one is the neglected tale of the trans widows - the women left behind by the men who would “become” them.
Part two is a product of my forthcoming book on the project to destroy our civilisation. I explain in this part why I think “rights” do wrongs.
I explain that, from the point of view of power, it is extremely useful to sell a personal declaration of war on the norms of society as progress.
I think the trans cult most clearly illustrates the nature of rights-based liberation struggles as partners to elite power.
Far from being a mission of emancipation, they deliver social and personal annihilation. Where successful, they pioneer the freedom of movement to a posthuman future for us all.
PART ONE: BEHIND THE LOOKING GLASS
The war on our civilisation has many fronts. It has been called an “Omniwar” by Dr David A Hughes, who I recently interviewed1. This is the use of financial, social and political crisis to shock the population into accepting a new - and permanent - technocratic world order.
With the omniwar in mind, today we look again at the “techno-fetishist cult masquerading as a civil rights movement” - with the first film on the women - and children - left behind by their “transitioned” husbands and fathers.
This is the story of the trans widows.
I spoke to Vaishnavi Sundar, asking her how she came to spend years making “Behind The Looking Glass”.
You can watch my interview with her here, which was published by LifeSiteNews.
The title of the film is a reference to the sexualised male narcissism which Sundar says has seen men “seek victimhood” in order to focus attention on themselves - at the expense of the women in their lives.
And how this attention is lavishly provided, she explains, with “trans” “women” given “catwalk” receptions in the press!
Her excellent film covers autogynephilia2, the influence of pornography, and for the first time records the voices of the women widowed by this latest product of “progress”. No one but Sundar has given them this platform. Naturally, she fears YouTube - and others - may soon take that away.
As these women speak, in the first film of its type, the viewer comes to realise this is a cult without borders.
Neither religion, race, class, age, education, wealth and culture have insulated any of these women’s lives from the radioactive transmission of the transgender cult.
Nor has the rights-based liberationism most of them champion. These women, and women generally, have been wronged by the use of rights.
I think this is another indication as to the explanatory power of this transhuman industry, at once a sexual fetish and a religion, which is being promoted by powerful billionaires, across the world.
For more on Bilek’s work on the Trans industry, see here:
At one point in Sundar’s film, a feminist academic states that “it is axiomatic on the Left that unheard voices will be heard.”
Yet no one on the Left wants to hear the voices of the trans widows.
What does this mean?
To the feminists, their movement has been hijacked by imposters. This is the cruel welcome of womanhood to the New World Order.
PART TWO: THE RIGHT TO DISSOLVE
A HISTORY OF LIBERATION
This movement of liberation - the emancipation of people by group through the securing of legal recognition and rights - had delivered an unbroken record of feminist victories since the 1920s.
Voting, smoking, working, earning, consuming. The sexual revolution with the pill detached gestation from fornication. The advances of the 1970s rapidly increased the number of women replacing the prison of the family and the unpaid labour of motherhood with the rewards of a career.
Set aside the fact, which Dr Hughes also notes, that feminism was promoted heavily by the Rockefeller foundation. This was to double the tax take, and to transfer the children from the education given in the family to the technocratically convenient instruction of the state. How efficient.
Family incomes halved, of course, and have fallen in real terms ever since the liberation of the 1970s.
With recent works on the dangers of the contraceptive pill3, and how this hormone disruptor displaces women’s personalities and preferences - a darker side to liberation has emerged.
As women are now being replaced by men dressed as grotesque parodies of their sex, I think it is time to re-evaluate the liberationist movement entirely.
Whilst many feminists seem to believe that the rights based agenda is unquestionably good, and can be regained for that purpose, I disagree.
It was never about improving, but removing the conditions of a meaningful life.
I think “emancipationism” a means of dissolving social cohesion and annihilating the human spirit, being a resolution of mankind's purpose into a permanent and personal declaration of war in place of the pursuit of the salvation of the soul.
This means that I consider the promise of liberty through rights to be a false one. A devil’s bargain, if you like. With the hindsight from the present, this is an easy case to make, and so I make it now.
WRONGS BY RIGHTS
The current supremacy of the “trans” in the progressive hierarchy of rights demonstrates several important factors.
One, these rights are taken, not given. They can be captured by an organised faction however insane - provided it is presented as progressive.
Two, the granting of these rights confers privilege - and power. The hierarchy of victimhood Sundar highlights in the film is a painful approach to the armature of rights-based liberation. It is a narrative of victimhood towards power.
To demand factional rights in this way is to identify as a victim - which can be a life sentence for the most committed. This is the seeking of advantage by the pleading of disadvantage.
Yet the more keenly the case of victimhood is pressed, the greater the advantage that is secured.
What results is fusion of the notion of social and technological progress with the prohibition of the obvious. This is extremely useful if you want to replace everything that is good, as you can say that what is new is also “improved”.
As with every factor of the counterfeit culture, the beginning and the end see the same words applied to two very different creatures. Women did not vote, they did not have “equality”.
This is true. Yet their mobilisation towards “liberation” was also unarguably towards a new technological society and its demands, and away from the traditional culture and that of the family. It remade not only the idea of woman, but that of the modern nation.
It is obvious that women have suffered not only the marginalisation of their entire sex, but also from rape, violence and threats of murder from the trans “women” who hate them, because they can never be them.
This is the nightside of rights. They are as much grievance as they are claims. In their clamour for power, genuine crimes are conflated with vengeance.
It is typical in every revolution that petty resentment is elevated with liberationist zeal.
FREEDOM FROM THE HUMAN CONDITION
Three, the rights based movements are neither “authentic” nor well intentioned. Though people believe in them, they do not deliver freedom. They annihilate, and do not liberate, their members.
The trans cult is simply the refinement of the technique of sociopolitical success via victimhood. Of course it is a vast and Satanic industry financed by the billionaires Bilek identifies.
Of course it is a progressive factor, being techno-fetishist, in the transition of our entire culture into a fetishised technocracy - a government by algorithm to deliver us from manufactured evil.
Yet the trans cult is also the most obvious example of the wrongs of “rights”. Women deserve human dignity, as do men and children. The trans cult is the most explicit violation of the value of human life yet to emerge from the liberationist stable.
THE ARITHMETIC OF RIGHTS
Four, the addition of a victim cult is a general subtraction in favour of the particular. Patrick Deneen said something like this, in Why Liberalism Failed. “Individual extremism” he said, creates factions whose demands for legal privilege are antagonistic - and cannot be reconciled. For those outside the New Privileges, a lesser order of “rights” is the result.
Women’s rights have not been improved by the rise of “trans” rights.
I think this means the rights-based cults resolve society into factions, dissolving social cohesion, and making an effective challenge to any established power more difficult.
The more this succeeds, the less effective people are in collectively opposing tyranny.
SOCIAL INJUSTICE
Five, rights based factions are a helpmeet to harm. This is why the trans cult, and all the other ones, are so enthusiastically promoted by State, corporation, charity and NGO.
Six, the power of legally privileged victimhood confers immunity. Such groups are more or less exempt from being accused of any negative actions they may commit, whether typically or not. This undermines the concept of universal justice, replacing it with a state of exception for anyone who can make a fuss.
It replaces reason with hysteria, and fosters exaggerated narratives of mistreatment. If you examine each of the protected groups of the New Privileged, you will find examples of this sort of atrocity propaganda.
“Trans genocide” is one.
THE TECHNIQUE OF RIGHTS-BASED PACIFICATION
Emancipation is a means of population management. It is a product in which people and their dreams of freedom are processed. Patronage is secured to neutralise factions into compliance with the rewarding power.
The trans cult is not the supreme victim cult, and not yet the most destructive. The crown of antisemitism will not be claimed by men in wigs.
Yet even the greatest narrative of victimhood, shielding its members from being accused of their actions, cannot survive the wholesale rejection of the narrative of persecution.
People are beginning to realise that the real victims are not the Grievance Groups - but themselves.
Together, we are all identified as equally disprivileged outside the charmed circles of liberation. The particular are privileged at the expense of the general.
Some are more equal than others, you might say.
This is not justice. It is certainly not equality. It replaces weaponised grievance with institutionalised prejudice, and it is driving the world mad with it.
It is not only the women left behind by the fetishist men, welcomed by a society which would prefer you to think life had no more meaning than an obscene spectacle.
It is all of us. Liberationism seeks to liberate man from mankind, woman from womanhood, children from innocence and humanity from itself, delivering it into a posthuman future: perfectly efficient, directed by the dreams of a machine.
If you would like to see me liberated from my liberty, please share my reckless reality-based propaganda.
With your help, my noticing of the obvious will so enrage the directors of the differently-saned that I shall be rusticated into a re-education camp, to emerge as a dreadlocked didgeridoo-er, having been forcefed crazy mushrooms.
This is the sexual fetish of the desire to possess “female” sex organs. It is shortened in the film to “AGP”. It’s a hard watch at times, but I would strongly recommend it as a real life corrective to this industrialised fantasy narrative.
Dr Sarah Hill’s 2021 book “How The Pill Changes Everything: Your Brain on Birth Control” was a watershed publication, noting how this obvious hormone disruptor changed tastes, partner selection, moral reasoning, concentration, violent mood swings and left women feeling driven out of their minds - because they were.
The Pill habituated women to taking tablets. This is another example of addition as subtraction. The more pills you take, the less of you there is, as “you” are neutralised through endocrine and brain chemistry disruption. You may not even look the same, but your name is still there. This is indicative of the wider practice of substitution.
Excellent piece. No “rights” organizations are about rights. They all are about power. And the worst thing to befall Western Civ thus far was women’s suffrage. They and the children they used to bear and once cared about are those most harmed by it.
And the people vocal about replacing "bronze age myths" and religious "superstition" with science (they effing love it, I'm told) are the ones most likely to embrace the unscientific transgender nonsense. Sorry, amigos, God assigned you XX or XY at birth.
Good call on Jews jealously swatting away any attempts to supplant them as the Apex Victim. Even now, with their army stomping on and obliterating innocents in their neighborhood, they milk 10/7 for all it's worth. Like every other time in history, it happened suddenly, and for no reason whatsoever.